The current study examined multilevel risk factors and developmental assets on longitudinal trajectories of aggressive behavior in a diverse sample of rural adolescents. Using ecological and social capital theories, we explored the impact of positive and negative proximal processes, social capital, and contextual characteristics (i.e., school and neighborhood) on adolescent aggression. Data came from the Rural Adaptation Project, which is a 5-year longitudinal panel study of more than 4,000 middle and high school students from 40 public schools in two rural, low income counties in North Carolina. A three-level HLM model (N = 4,056 at Wave 1, 4,251 at Wave 2, and 4,256 at Wave 3) was estimated to predict factors affecting the change trajectories of aggression.
Results indicated that negative proximal processes in the form of parent-adolescent conflict, friend rejection, peer pressure, delinquent friends, and school hassles were significant predictors of aggression. In addition, social capital in the form of ethnic identity, religious orientation, and school satisfaction served as buffers against aggression. Negative proximal processes were more salient predictors than positive proximal processes. School and neighborhood characteristics had a minimal impact on aggression. Overall, rates of aggression did not change significantly over the 3-year study window.
Findings highlight the need to intervene in order to decrease negative interactions in the peer and parent domains
Via: http://ht.ly/S4Ptq
By: Smokowski PR1,2, Guo S3, Cotter KL4, Evans CB1, Rose RA1.
- 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, North Carolina Academic Center for Excellence in Youth Violence Prevention, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
- 2University of Kansas School of Social Welfare, Lawrence, Kansas.
- 3Washington University George Warren Brown School of Social Work, St. Louis, Missouri.
- 4Arizona State University School of Social Work, Tucson, Arizona
Despite the growing attention surrounding crack cocaine use in Brazil, little is understood about crack users’ histories, use patterns and the interplay of drug-use behaviors, settings, and access/barriers to care. Qualitative studies seldom cross-compare findings regarding people who use crack from different settings. This study aims to explore the insights of regular crack users in two major Brazilian cities and to examine how social and contextual factors, including stigma and marginalization, influence initial use and a range of health and social issues.
For study participants from both cities, frequent crack cocaine use plays a central role in daily life and leads to a range of physical, psychological, and social consequences. Common concerns among users include excessive crack use, engagement in risky habits, infrequent health service utilization, marginalization, and difficulty reducing use.
Disadvantaged conditions in which many crack cocaine users grow up and live may perpetuate risk behaviors and stigma may further marginalize users from necessary health and recovery services. Reducing stigma and moralizing discourse related to drug use, especially among health professionals and law enforcement personnel, may help encourage users to seek necessary care. New harm-reduction-based care and treatment alternatives for marginalized drug users are being developed in parts of Brazil and elsewhere and should be adapted and expanded for other populations in need.
Read at: http://ht.ly/QzkAM HT @reitoriaUFRJ
