Motivation for aggressive religious radicalization: Goal regulation theory and a personality × threat × affordance hypothesis

A new set of hypotheses is presented regarding the cause of aggressive religious radicalization (ARR). It is grounded in classic and contemporary theory of human motivation and goal regulation, together with recent empirical advances in personality, social, and neurophysiological psychology. We specify personality traits, threats, and group affordances that combine to divert normal motivational processes toward ARR. Conducive personality traits are oppositional, anxiety-prone, and identity-weak (i.e., morally bewildered). Conducive threats are those that arise from seemingly insurmountable external forces and frustrate effective goal regulation. Conducive affordances include opportunity for immediate and concrete engagement in active groups that are powered by conspiracy narratives, infused with cosmic significance, encouraging of moral violence, and sealed with religious unfalsifiability. We propose that ARR is rewarding because it can spur approach motivated states that mask vulnerability for people whose dispositions and circumstances would otherwise leave them mired in anxious distress.

“We have killed all of the children in the auditorium…what do we do now?”

—Taliban gunman, December 16, 2014

Full article at: http://ht.ly/Th5GZ

By: Ian McGregor,1,* Joseph Hayes,1 and Mike Prentice2

1Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

2Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

*Correspondence: Ian McGregor, Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada, ac.oolretawu@rogergcm.nai

1

More at:  https://twitter.com/hiv_insight